My uncle posted a mis-quotation on Facebook that had George Washington supporting the intrusion of the bible into government affairs. The quote was this: "It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible."
What follows is a series of posts in regards to his question on whether the accounted quote was indeed a fake. There were a few other comments but, those were mostly in direct response to the original post, I did not include them but one was short and supported my proposition that it was a fake quote, and the other was simply a bible verse quoted to me.
My uncle:
"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington
OK HISTORY BUFFS...I NEED YOUR HELP!!!
HISTORY ISN'T MY STRONG SUIT!
I'VE ALWAYS HEARD, AND EVEN READ SOMEWHERE I’M SURE, THAT PRESIDENT WASHINGTON MADE THIS STATEMENT.
AS A CHRISTIAN, AND A PREACHER, I'VE QUOTED IT, AND HEARD OTHERS QUOTE IT...I’VE SAID IT IN MESSAGES THAT I'VE PREACHED.
I DON'T THINK I'VE EVER HEARD ANYONE CHALLENGE IT. BUT MY FRIEND AND LEARN-ED NEPHEW, JACK, SAYS DIFFERENT (see below from an earlier post). THANKS JACK. I MEAN IT!
I'M NOT AFRAID OF BEING WRONG...I JUST WANT TO BE RIGHT WHEN IT COMES TO SOMETHING THIS SERIOUS.
THIS IS IMPORTANT, DON’T YOU THINK! IT'S THE FOUNDATION OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY!
I'M DEPENDIN' ON YOU!
OK HISTORY BUFFS...I NEED YOUR HELP!!!
HISTORY ISN'T MY STRONG SUIT!
I'VE ALWAYS HEARD, AND EVEN READ SOMEWHERE I’M SURE, THAT PRESIDENT WASHINGTON MADE THIS STATEMENT.
AS A CHRISTIAN, AND A PREACHER, I'VE QUOTED IT, AND HEARD OTHERS QUOTE IT...I’VE SAID IT IN MESSAGES THAT I'VE PREACHED.
I DON'T THINK I'VE EVER HEARD ANYONE CHALLENGE IT. BUT MY FRIEND AND LEARN-ED NEPHEW, JACK, SAYS DIFFERENT (see below from an earlier post). THANKS JACK. I MEAN IT!
I'M NOT AFRAID OF BEING WRONG...I JUST WANT TO BE RIGHT WHEN IT COMES TO SOMETHING THIS SERIOUS.
THIS IS IMPORTANT, DON’T YOU THINK! IT'S THE FOUNDATION OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY!
I'M DEPENDIN' ON YOU!
Me:
The quote has been tied to many different sources all pointing to George Washington as being the author. One such source is in his 32 page hand written farewell speech given to the nation urging them to elect another candidate. It was his way of politely and courteously telling everyone "No I will not do a third term, now get off my back."
The quote has been tied to many different sources all pointing to George Washington as being the author. One such source is in his 32 page hand written farewell speech given to the nation urging them to elect another candidate. It was his way of politely and courteously telling everyone "No I will not do a third term, now get off my back."
This is that document, and that quote is not there:
The next source is coming from Washington’s Proclamation on Thanksgiving, which he begins with
"In such a state of things it is in an especial manner our duty as a people, with devout reverence and affectionate gratitude, to acknowledge our many and great obligations to Almighty God and to implore Him to continue and confirm the blessings we experience."
This statement shows obvious public piety and deism, as he was known to do from time to time. However, that statement and another truncated one, taken from a children biography of the President, have been combined and out forth as direct quote.
This is the portion taken from A Life of Washington (1836, 37 years after the presidents death) by James K. Paulding:
"It is impossible to reason without arriving at a Supreme Being. Religion is as necessary to reason as reason is to religion. The one cannot exist without the other. A reasoning being would lose his reason in attempting to account for the great phenomena of nature, had he not a Supreme Being to refer to; and well has it been said, that if there had been no God, mankind would have been obliged to imagine one"
The authenticity of that second half of the quote is already questionable in authenticity, but even still let’s takes it as truth, from Washington's lips to god’s ear, as it were. He does not actually say the quote that has become famous, only postulates that the facts of the universe at that time, and still true today, are not fully known. Interpret as you will, but I take it as a deist’s admission to lack of complete understanding, which is as fair as anything else especially in a time before they understood what germs were. Also, he paraphrases Voltaire in the end stating that if there isn't a god, the man would have invented one; referencing the previous example he gave including our/ his inability to reason the phenomena of nature.
I have heard this quote a hundred times, mostly to explain that the fathers of our nation were not secularists, and were in fact Christians and this is a Christian nation. In fact, it was under the presidency of Washington when a treaty with a Muslim Nation was written and later signed by the succeeding president, John Adams, where my next quote came from:
"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,— as it has in itself no character or enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,— and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
Just to be fair, "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion" is often misquoted as well to be from Washington's own lips, when in fact, it was not.
My point is, misquoting people has often lead to many misunderstandings of the nation’s beginnings, and because neither the people being quoted, or the authors who put the words to paper first are alive today, we must go off official record and documents. Here say from a children's biography and truncation/ out of context paraphrases are not going to prove anyone case, it will only further divide the people, who I truly believe only want the best for the country, and just simply have differing methods of becoming the best we can be. Arguing and debating the fact that US beginnings were hard fought secularists ideas and revolutionary in practice is just as fruitless as debating whether or not the president has direct power of the price of gas.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Response from his friend:
Whether George Washington said it or not, that statement is true! Just think how great America would still be if we just adhered to the Bible!
My rebuttal:
In response to how the world would be better if we all adhered to the bible I would like to say a few things. With respect to your own beliefs and your own practices, I want to preface that the bible has no authority over those who do not believe in its authenticity as a supreme beings actual words or intentions; this is inclusive of Muslims, Jews (at least the New Testament), and Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists and agnostics alike. This country is not just a nation with Christians, many other denominations of faiths and philosophies that coexist under one rule of law which has intended balance and best attempt at equality created into it. The constitution is a document that was written without any mention of a supreme being, a national religion and was once describe by Thomas Jefferson, that it (referencing the Bill of Rights and the First amendment) was a document that “built a wall of separation between church and state.” In fact like many of the words that Jefferson used, it was first spoken by the Baptist founder of the Rhode Island colony, Roger Williams. He used the metaphor of a religious garden versus the wild reality that exist in the world and the separation that need exist between the two with his influential quote "[A] hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world."
The Bible whether you believe in its words or not, is a book that few even among believers can agree has the same meaning. In some ways it makes the Bible very fitting, as it allows generations of readers the ability to take from it the lessons most applicable to the day. This benefit is also its downfall as it allows people to pick and choose parts for which to put the burden of the modern day’s issues into biblical context rather than taking the context of the bible, and its writers, and expose the lack of parallelism between the modern issue and the problems that worked against the authors in their day. For example, the contraception argument; at the time it was imperative to grow the Jewish faith in order for the people to prevent their own extinction, thus it was made a sin for man to spill his seed
I greatly respect anyone who chooses to had a belief, I may not agree but I will not hesitate to fight for your right to do as you wish with you conscience. However, I will also do the same for those who do not believe the same as you, which is one of the tenements that make this country great, which it most certainly is still today. By allowing such a book to regulate and influence the course of government, you bring in a wide mix of interpretations from the antiemetic aspect, to the in equal rights of the LGBT community. You may believe that gays should not have a right to marry, but others might believe that you have no right to speak if you are a woman. The bible says both, woman’s suffrage would never have happened had it not been for women like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, the author of The Woman's Bible, which put forth arguments disputing those of the day where women, as per the bibles own written words, were to be subservient to men. Like the LGBT of today, Elizabeth Stanton challenged religious orthodoxy to force righteousness into the government, and move the people forward into a new era.
I would like to put forth; If we all adhered to the bible, as you suggest, many many people would not have voices that our very outspoken today. People such as Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Hilary Clinton, even men like Obama and Colin Powel would be shunned had the biblical arguments promoting slavery and racial inequality been utilized by the U.S. government.
You may wish the bible was as fantastic of a document to govern states, but the fact is that it has been used as an argument for every one of America’s greatest advances. This is not opinion; this is fact and has been written in everything from fiction novels to textbooks and educational literature. The bible, as a document of regulation is as wrought with injustices as Hammurabi’s code (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/hamcode.asp) or the Twelve Tables (http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/12tables.html) that ruled over the Roman Republic, which was a good beginning for the republic ideals of equality. Like many firsts, even here in our own country, the first Continental Congress Failed to create a document or philosophy that was held to be just and fair. Religion, and by extension the bible, is a good first try by civilized mankind but is no more adept at governing a nation today than the Egyptian Book of the Dead is as explaining the preservation of a corpse; it is antiquated and is better kept as an individual practice and philosophy. The founders knew this and they created a structure of governing that was independent and free of dogma, with a system of checks and balances that would ensure as much fairness and equality as they could predict at the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Her rebuke:
The ROMANS ROAD....is a pathway you can walk.
It is a group of Bible verses from the book of Romans in the New Testament. If you walk down this road you will end up understanding how to be saved.
Romans 3:23 "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God."
We all have sin in our hearts. We all were born with sin.
We were born under the power of sin's control.
- Admit that you are a sinner.
Romans 6:23a "For the wages of sin is death..."
Sin has an ending. It results in death. We all face physical death, which is a result of sin. But a worse death is spiritual death that alienates us from God, and will last for all eternity. The Bible teaches that there is a place called the Lake of Fire where lost people will be in torment forever. It is the place where people who are spiritually dead will remain.
- Understand that you deserve death for your sin.
Romans 6:23b "...but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
Salvation is a free gift from God to you! You can't earn this gift, but you must reach out and receive it.
- Ask God to forgive you and save you.
Romans 5:8, "But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."
When Jesus died on the cross He paid sin's penalty. He paid the price for all sin, and when He took all the sins of the world on Himself on the cross, He bought us out of slavery to sin and death! The only condition is that we believe in Him and what He has done for us, understanding that we are now joined with Him, and that He is our life. He did all this because He loved us and gave Himself for us!
- Give your life to God... His love poured out in Jesus on the cross is your only hope to have forgiveness and change. His love bought you out of being a slave to sin. His love is what saves you -- not religion, or church membership. God loves you!
Romans 10:13 "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
- Call out to God in the name of Jesus!
Romans 10:9,10 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation."
- If you know that God is knocking on your heart's door, ask Him to come into your heart.
Jesus said,
Revelation 3:20a "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me."
- Is Jesus knocking on your heart's door?
Believe in Him.
Ask Him to come in to your heart by faith, and ask Him to reveal Himself to you.
Open the Bible to the Gospel of John and read what God says about Jesus, about you, and about being born again.
God will help you. He loves you.
You need to look for a local church where God's word is preached. The Bible says that we are to desire God's word like a newborn baby desires mother's milk.
Aren't you hungry to know the truth?
My message directly to her:
I don't see how that is relevant to the topics I brought up. I have read the bible quite a few times and am just as capable of quoting as you. Please do not mistake my lack of commitment to religion as a lack of knowledge, understanding and familiarity with any of the religions and their gods.
The topic brought up was about a quote, which I have given my bit and cited my sources; the second was about your statement of bettering the country through the bible. I took the opposing side with all due respect. I do not take it as a compliment or a pleasure to be constantly, when expressing truth, barraged with quotes from a book that I think, while well-meaning in its intentions, is peppered with fallacies and questionable morality; not to mention interpreted out of context on a regular basis. It was after all, penned by men who were thinking of god. Let us not forget the lesson of 9/11; it's always dangerous to "transcend" moral values, thinking that a person who truly thinks of God won't commit evil deeds, even by result of incident.
I do know your beliefs, and I am constantly on search of truth. I feel as though I am more inclined to follow truth than you if your only reference is the bible itself; as that is circular reasoning in the sense of proving truth using the object in debate as source. I do apologize if this seems harsh, as I do not want to trample on anyone’s political, religious or personal philosophies, but you introduced yourself into the conversation and I, as much as you, have a right to explain my point of view. If you truly read what I wrote, and understood, you would not feel inclined to quote me Romans, for you would know I would be inclined to follow in your example and to quote you St. Paul in 1 Timothy 2:12 “I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.” In the mythos, Jesus of Nazareth may have died for the sins of man, but aren’t you (much like those who would not see gays marry on basis of sin) who have known of the sin, to stop and discontinue the practice of going against the word of god and his earthly prophets?
I do not need to be saved, as “salvation” is much determined by which god you follow at which period of time. There are any ways to salvation, not all are Christian, as Christianity is not the first religion whose promise of salvation brought others into the fold. Jesus himself is quoted as saying to an apostle in Matthew 19:26 “with men it [salvation] is impossible, but with god anything is possible.” Krishna is quoted in the Bhagavad Gita (9,27) "Consider all your acts as acts of devotion to me, whether eating, offering, giving away, performing austerities. Perform them as an offering to me. In this way you will be free from karma, you will be liberated and you will come to me." Salvation for those of Islam is following the Five Pillars of Islamic practice:
1) The belief that Allah is the only god and that Muhammad is his messenger;
2) Performing the five daily prayers;
3) Fasting throughout the month of Ramadan;
4) Charity, giving to the poor;
5) The pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime, if one can afford it.
As you can see, there are many written ways to salvation, not a single one more invalid or correct than the other. Each of those that I have given for example, and trust there are many more, all focus heavily of honoring their version of the supreme being. Being saved does not seem so clear cut when considering all the other methods, all of them being mutually exclusive.
I do not follow any religion; salvation is not something I yearn for in a spiritual sense. I only wish to live a good life as honest as I can and be as good to others as I would wish them to be towards me. I do this without fear of being persecuted for not. That is my point of salvation. Any god who would condemn me, let them judge and should they decide that I have not prayed enough, dedicated enough or believed enough in their name… then they shall be right and I would have them do their worse. In this life, however I will continue to be as righteous as my reason and wit can conjure. It is a heartfelt belief that I am the only one who has seen my life through my eyes and thus cannot be judged by any other than myself and on my own deathbed in retrospect, I can only hope to not disappoint myself in my final hours. Hearing another version of a gods words spoken behind a podium is not going to do me any justice, alter my behavior, or change my perspective on the matter. Whether it is a Temple, Mosque a Church or a Wiccan gathering, as I have been to all, none but my own research and understanding will change me. Please, in the future when talking to another atheist, agnostic, religious believer of another faith, do not assume that they have not figured for themselves, but rather listen to their words and their reason. If you feel them inadequate for logic, by all means educating is expected I would assume. Proselytizing to someone who has heard all the words before is just going to further push them away from an interest in discovering actual truth.
Her response:
Ok. So say I'm wrong, that the Bible is just a book of "stories". What have I lost by accepting Christ as my Savior and living according to the Bible? Nothing. Jack, what if I'm right? If I'm right I will spend eternity if heaven walking on streets of gold. If I am right, you will spend eternity burning in hell. Is that a chance you really want to take?
My response:
Your take my intentions not only out of context, but insult me by insinuating that I am of simple minded nature by assuming I have never have considered the argument you put forth.
I never once said the bible is just a bunch of stories, if I truly believed that then I would be attacking “Hansel and Gretel” for insinuating that cannibalistic witches truly exist! Some of the parables such as Jesus’ Parable of the Good Samaritan, are obviously good lessons and should be taught, regardless of religious affiliation or attachment to dogma.
As far as you argument for following the word of the bible, let me ask you something that I have asked countless devout followers. Had the bible not been written would you be an immoral person? I have asked this many times and heard consistent answers that their morality comes from the bible and were it not for the bible, they may well be thieves, murders and rapists. I do not call that morality; I call that following the rules because you’re afraid of the consequences. As an atheist, I detest this logic, it means that you are not doing well for humanity out of the respect and sanctity of life and equality of all man-kind; you do it because you don’t want to spend eternity burning in hell.
If your argument that you put forth is any indication of your rational for following what you believe is the moral path set forth by the bible, then your reasoning is simply reward driven. Do you know why a dog obeys its human master? It is the reward of a treat and the threat of punishment. You are following the “moral path” of the bible simply for the reward of a treat, being next to your god in his glory and to “walk on streets of gold.” Not only does your personal greed for the reward pull you into submission, but your fear of the punishment for not doing so has you bound to the dogma, just as the dog fears being chained to a tree prevents him from acting out of our will.
What have you lost by taking Jesus as a savior, you have lost responsibility for your own actions. If you can be forgiven for your sins by a figure you have never met in person, in the flesh, who has only been quoted in the bible but has no books that are claimed by his pen (thus his words are hearsay), then you hold no responsibility for any of your own actions, as in your mind if you truly believe, you have already been forgiven. I take responsibility and want, nor deserve forgiveness for anything that I do unless I have wronged a person and directly apologize\ atone for my misgivings. Praying to a god to forgive me, without having to look them in the eye at the time of my weakest moment of sincere atonement and apologetics, is not a trait I would consider strength in character.
I explained; I do not fear a punishment for following a moral code that has been ironed out by reason and rational. If your god will punish me for wanting the LGBT community to have the same rights as me, for wanting people to take responsibility of their sexuality and be protected to help temper over population and end family poverty and require aid, if he truly wants to punish me with fire and brimstone at the hands of Beelzebub the lord of flies for wanting women to be treated with equality and not forced to marry and bear the children of their rapists (Deuteronomy 22:28-29) and be treated with compassion and respect if such an unfortunate event does occur; then I welcome the punishment! For I will know true morality, and would not want to be with that lord who kills those who believe in other gods, even if they were good men (Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT), the lord of death to children whose father has broken a tenet (Isaiah 14:21 NAB), punishment unequal to crimes with death to childhood bullies (2 Kings 2:23-24 NAB) and rape to captured women (Isaiah 13:15-18 NLT), Promoter of sex slavery, YHWH may well be a pimp (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT ). I do not hold those moral values, as the god of the bible clearly does. I do not want to be rewarded for such an injustice. I do not even want to be rewarded at all for my deeds that I consider valiant; I only wish that I be not punished by being around those who would claim moral superiority over me because I say that I do not follow their god’s immorality.
And if you argument is that, many of the atrocities I presented are in the Old Testament, I would mention that the rules of contraception are also, in the Old Testament. What god says about homosexuals is in the Old Testament and many of the arguments put forth against abortion are from the Old Testament. Naming just a few… Obviously the Old Testament is a relevant in the follower’s eyes, in the sense of biblical law, in modern times as much as they were in the days they were written.
Is this a chance I really want to take? Yes, my mind and heart are in harmony that justice is not the word of a, probably misinterpreted, lord/ god /goddess but rather a morality set by me for myself based on compassion for humanity, logic, rational, justice and equality and intellect rather than superstition and threats of harm.
Also, I had believed that you would have given the main topic of the argument its due respect and attention. When you posted your response regarding the 1st amendment and your analysis of the intent and subsequent usage of the tenet from Jefferson; I had thought you had done a fantastic job with valid arguments and original thought. It turns out you’re a plagiarist! (http://www.schoolprayerinamerica.info/1separationchurchstate.html) Next time, if you want to insult a debate as important and current to today with impact reaching further than just a Facebook page; I beg you, have an original thought or at least cite your sources instead of passing someone else’s hard work, thought and logic off as your own. I do not apologize for what I have just said; you are a liar for submitting ideas not of your own mind or words not of your lips. I have nothing but respect for those who are genuine followers of faith, nothing but respect for those who oppose my opinions and my reason with logic. You are a follower for fear of punishment, and you do not even know why you think you are against my opinion or reason much less present your own logic to dispute with. I sincerely hope that you will read more than just religious texts, perhaps Howard Zinn PhD. (History of the US), Dr. Daniel Dennett (Cognitive scientist\ philosopher), Carl Sagan PhD. (Scientist), Dr. Sam Harris (neuroscientist and philosopher), Karen Armstrong (author on comparative religions), Bart D. Ehrman (New Testament Scholar), The Jefferson Bible (Thomas Jefferson). There are many more, some of whom I have read some I have not. If you want a larger list please ask, but do not begin to debate arguments that you do not have a firm grasp of, and can speak with your own honest thought and cite your sources if need be.